He serves his party best who serves the country best. “The President of the United States of necessity owes his election to office to the suffrage and zealous labors of a political party, the members of which cherish with ardor and regard as of essential importance the principles of their party organization but he should strive to be always mindful of the face that he serves his party best who serves the country best.” What he said is as relevant today as it was then: In that speech, which Democrats boycotted, he tried to put to rest their suspicions of him. Hayes carried out the evil bargain despite having declared in his inaugural address that “only a local government which recognizes and maintains inviolate the rights of all is a true self-government.” That was to withdraw federal troops from the South and end Reconstruction, which condemned Blacks in the South to some four score and ten years of subjugation. Hayes, who was a genuine Civil War hero and a mediocre president, is best remembered for the deal his supporters made to resolve his contested 1876 election with Democrat Samuel J. No backroom dealsįor the same reason, the party should not make any pertinent decisions behind closed doors, as it did over the loyalty rule last May and again last week. Given the enormous role that primaries play in presidential elections, that law might not survive a court challenge, and it shouldn’t. Florida law allows each recognized party that holds a primary to decide which candidates will be on the ballot (the Florida primary is Tuesday, March 19, 2024). The difference between the national party policy and the repealed state rule is that only the latter had the force of state law behind it. The party rule lets him weasel out of that. ![]() Voters have a right to see whether he would flummox himself or his rivals, who ought to be entitled to a showdown with him. Besides being unenforceable, the requirement also gives Trump a very handy excuse to boycott debates and thumb his nose at the public. The national Republican Party should repeal that rule too. They would be professing unconditional support for someone facing the possibility of prison time who, at the moment, appears more qualified for the Big House than for the White House.īut they remain stuck, at the moment, with the national Republican Party’s demand to pledge support for the nominee, whoever that may be, in order to participate in the remaining pre-primary debates. They would be pledging their loyalty to him, not to the Constitution that he tried to overthrow after losing the 2020 election - the Constitution to which those who are or have been public officials long ago swore their support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |